G4UCJ Shacks
name02

LAST UPDATED: 1st January 2021

This page details some of the pervious shacks and antennas I have used over the past few years. Once I find a layout that works, I tend to stick with it until something (may be a change in a particular area of interest, or perhaps new equipment arriving) requires that I change it. The last major change occurred in 2013, when I moved to my present QTH. This actually meant a downsize in available room for the radio gear, so I was forced to reassess my requirements and remove some of the underused gear. The result can be seen on the main shack page. Also on this page are my previous antenna layouts and details, which I have included as they may be of some use to others who want to utilize whatever space they have available, particularly those who want to get on HF but only have a small garden.  

Shack with ID 1213
tn_Stack Aug 13
tn_racal 1792 no label
sm16
tn_shack-new
tn_IMG_5545_1166x778.jpg-for-web-large sm9 (3)

ANTENNAS:

Below are some of the antennas I used over the previous 10 years or so. Antennas are the one thing that change regularly at G4UCJ, as my interests vary over time, I need the right antenna for the job.

The main antenna now is a wire dipole for 15 and 10m mounted in my attic, due to a move of QTH. My old antenna was a 20m long OCF (Off Centre Fed) Dipole in an inverted Vee/L configuration due to the length restriction of the garden. The apex of the OCF is 10m above ground. I purchased this antenna as a ‘short’ OCF that covered from 20m thru 6m. However after a few weeks of use I decided to extend the antenna so that it would cover 40m (having done some  careful calculations to ensure it would fit in the available space. This antenna was originally 10.5m long but I replaced the shorter, 3.5m, wire with a 13m wire. It has a slightly different element length ratio than the smaller one (which was 3:1). The longer element is now sloping at about 45 degrees instead of a much shallower slope, which could only be achieved by lengthening the support pole at the fence post from 3m to 5m or more, which at this time is impractical. Above are various shots of the OCF/Windom configuration. The drawing gives more detail of the actual installation. The SWR on 40, 20, 17 and 10m are all 2:1 or below, which is acceptable. 30 and 15m are extremely high and 12m is around 3-4:1. Now that I have an ATU, I can tune all bands, and show a good SWR to the radio (and hence keep the PA stresses due to impedance mismatch to a minimum).

choke closeup tn_OCF from below
tn_ocf1
tn_ocf centre 1
end 2
tn_ocf other view 3
OCF Plans1
tn_ocf support 1
IMG_1925_resize

The other HF antenna used here is a Wellbrook ALA1530s active loop with a diameter of 1m. This is mounted at 3m above ground on my ‘antenna tree’ (a 10m high dead tree with the branches cut off by a previous occupier!) In an ideal world the antenna should be rotatable to take advantage of it’s excellent bi-directional nulls but mine is on a fixed mount and attached to the tree so rotating it would be an issue, but if I do need to move it I can rotate it to some extent by hand (but as this requires a spanner and a step ladder, it doesn’t happen very often!).  As frequency increases the directional properties of the loop become less apparent (except for local noise) and I am able to hear stations from all headings. Yes it is expensive, but having used it for a good while, I can say that the expense is justified. This one antenna covers me from LW right up to 6m (although being so low it does not work nearly as well as it did at my old QTH where it was at 14m and in the clear also this one has a fair bit less gain at 6m than my old one (the ALA330s)). The ALA1530 is mainly used for receiving frequencies up to 7 MHz on the main receiver, as a general purpose and DRM antenna for the Racal and SDR radios and, occasionally, as a ‘noise’ pickup antenna for use with the MFJ noise canceler, a job which it does very well (being closer to the ground it picks up electrical noise from surrounding houses, such as plasma TV’s and PC’s, usually more strongly than the OCF and allowing me to null out or reduce most of the worst noise sources down to an acceptable level.). Other times I use a random wire

1530-1 tn_loop from below 2 025

I installed a dedicated 6m antenna in preparation for the Sporadic E season, which has been in progress for a few weeks now. I used my Windom last year and it worked well and allowed me to hear signals from the Caribbean and North America amongst others. I am not in a situation where I can put up a yagi for 6m but a sloping wire dipole is just about acceptable (I hope!). The top is at about 9m and the bottom is about 7m up and it is in the clear. It is facing about East, maybe slightly north of East, and should have some directionality towards that direction (of course it does mean I potentially lose out to the West (i.e. USA) but it shouldn’t be too bad. Reception tests on the local beacons show an increase of about 3 s -points on the nearer one and on the farther one, which is almost due West of here, there is not much between them. I think the dipole is slightly stronger but, and this is a big but, the dipole has a lower noise level so signals at the same strength sound quite a bit clearer/stronger. It will be interesting to compare the two side by side during the Es season. Below is an image of the 6m sloping dipole. The right angled wire above is the HF OCF dipole, detailed above. The air core choke is further down the feeder than I wanted (it should be at the feedpoint, but it is so far down that it is not visible in the image), but I had wound it already and I wanted to test the antenna. When I service/adjust the antennas I will move the choke up to the feedpoint. It is a simple 4 turn choke about 3” in diameter, wound over a plastic drinks beaker (which was then removed after the choke was secured. It is important that the choke is ‘solenoid’ wound (the turns are side-by-side) rather than ‘scramble’ wound where the coax is just coiled up with turns overlapping. The solenoid method of winding, although trickier to do increases the impedance of the choke, which is the whole purpose of the choke in the first place (any signals on the outer braid of the coax are literally choked off and cannot travel any further down the feeder). This method also minimizes inter-turn coupling.

6msloper
[Home] [My Shack] [Log Stats] [G4UCJ Shacks] [SW Radio] [Weather Sats] [HF DXing] [VHF DXing] [Contesting] [NDB & Beacons] [Digital Modes] [My Articles etc.] [ADS-B] [Links] [Clubs] [My Family] [Thanks!!] [Cookie Info]